Analysis: The EU wants to foist British gun laws on the rest of the Continent

Yesterday’s EU announcement of the precise wording of its draft gun ban, which unelected legislators want to have in force by July next year, has nothing to do with its stated purpose of targeting terrorists. Instead it is a step on the long, slow march towards banning civilian firearms ownership.

Most of the draft directive – which you can read along with UK Shooting News’ commentary – appears to have its roots in Britain’s firearms laws. Certainly the proposal to “harmonise” deactivation standards to put deactivated firearms permanently beyond reactivation comes from Britain – and, it has to be said, is actually very sensible. No sane person wants criminals to be able to reactivate a deactivated firearm and use it to commit murder.

The proposal to ban military-style semi-automatic firearms would be an effective ban on most self-loading pistols and commonly used fullbore semi-automatic rifles, as seen in nations such as Finland and Poland, both of whose governments appear to be opposing the EU ban.

Tragically, UK Shooting News has already seen shooters in Britain trying to claim this is not a big deal because Britain already bans fullbore semi-automatic rifles and the remaining .22″ semi-auto market’s military clone sector is too small to care about.

The most stupid of all the proposals is to ban “semi-automatic firearms for civilian use which resemble weapons with [an] automatic mechanism”. This is a feel-good measure that restricts firearms based on form, not function. Surprisingly, British law takes the logical – if misguided – view that function is the thing to restrict, as opposed to the mere appearance of a firm.

Suggestions of mandatory medical testing have not been explicitly raised in the UK. However, the National Police Chiefs’ Council has been mounting a sustained attack on shooters’ privacy, insisting that doctors should become paid informants on shooters by handing over their medical records for unqualified police employees to read. That proposal is intended to load shooters with an extra cost for gaining certificates, as part of the police drive to force people out of the sport of shooting by making it too expensive to get a certificate.

It may well be that mandatory medical tests – as opposed to unrestricted access to sensitive medical records – was ACPO’s long term goal.

Whatever else comes out of the gun ban proposal, European shooters’ associations are reacting angrily. Firearms United, who first spotted the proposal in a Polish newspaper (as reported here on UKSN) has posted many useful links to its Facebook page, while the German Rifle Association is mobilising its members to lobby their MEPs and get them to vote against the ban. FACE, the federation of association of European hunters and shooters, has published a thoughtful essay on why the ban is a silly idea – and, given its previous lobbying and engagement efforts, is a force to be reckoned with.

In the UK, both the Countryside Alliance and BASC have published reactions to the ban. Notably, the NRA has not published anything at the time of writing.

However, the great danger is that the unelected commissars in Brussels simply ram through the ban against the wishes of millions of people and thousands of businesses. After all, ignoring the wishes of the population was one of the explicit aims of the EU’s architects, in whose collective memory lived the fact that Adolf Hitler’s government was democratically elected into power by a majority. That attempt to avoid one of history’s greatest mistakes has caused untold misery since – and may be about to do so again.

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “Analysis: The EU wants to foist British gun laws on the rest of the Continent

  1. Victor

    “Certainly the proposal to “harmonise” deactivation standards to put deactivated firearms permanently beyond reactivation comes from Britain – and, it has to be said, is actually very sensible. No sane person wants criminals to be able to reactivate a deactivated firearm and use it to commit murder.”

    Don’t be fooled. It means a valuable deactivated MP40 or STG that can still field strip will become a ‘UK style’ welded up paperweight with no moving parts:

    http://www.mydeactivatedguns.co.uk/dfn_thumbnailer.php?img=images/upload/upload/upload/01312156677h.jpg&mw=800&mh=600

    Like

    Reply
  2. tim

    I realise that this is aimed at live fire guys, however re deacts, they rammed that through with the prepped spec thrown together in roughly four days.
    That spec is retro active and will effectively trash the value of what I have. If they actually go the whole hog and ban class A deactivated that is effectively most of what I own.
    You must also remember that the guys collecting do not just collect the weapon, they collect the system as well, tripods, differing magazines and belt feeds as appropriate, range finders, tools ,cleaning kits. The whole lot goes down the pan. The museums are being offered a get out clause, If they can keep their first run 1937 Bren………why cant I??. Its more like a history trashing session. I suppose they will start burning the books next.
    The UK spec leaves just about enough to study and understand, this new crap is designed to destroy the market.

    Like

    Reply

Leave a comment...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s